Published by Crackers Books,
12 July 2024
https://crackersbooks.com/papercrunch
Research Paper Crunch\\
Decoding Organizational Intentionality: Microfoundations and Strategic Action Fields
Little, D. (2020). Organizations as actors: Microfoundations of organizational intentionality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393120917642
Introduction
The paper "Organizations as Actors: Microfoundations of Organizational Intentionality" by Daniel Little explores the concept of group agency, particularly in large organizations. It delves into the processes through which organizations form collective knowledge and actions, emphasizing the microfoundations—individual and meso-level processes—that underlie organizational intentionality.
Summary
The article begins by addressing the philosophical debates on collective agency, referencing notable scholars like Margaret Gilbert, Raimo Tuomela, Michael Bratman, and Christian List. Little critiques the holistic view of group agency, which posits that groups can have intentions independent of individual members. Instead, he argues for a microfoundational approach, where the focus is on the concrete processes through which individuals in organizations come to form collective intentions and actions.
Little uses the theory of strategic action fields to illustrate how organizations operate. He explains that organizations are not monolithic entities but are composed of various subunits and individuals with their own interests and motivations. This complexity leads to several challenges, such as principal-agent problems, conflicts of interest, and loose coupling among subunits. These issues result in organizations having limited coherence, unity, and consistency over time.
The paper further explores the concept of "bounded localistic organizational rationality," suggesting that organizational actions and beliefs are shaped by localized rational processes rather than a unified rationality. This perspective helps in understanding the apparent irrationality and inconsistency in organizational behavior.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Lessons Learned
Conclusion
Daniel Little's paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of organizational intentionality by emphasizing the microfoundations and strategic action fields that shape collective knowledge and action. Despite some complexity, its theoretical richness and practical insights make it a significant work for those interested in the philosophy of social sciences and organizational behavior.
สั่งหนังสือทุกเล่มของ Crackers books
สั่งหนังสือทุกเล่มของ Crackers books
ราคา 150 บาท
สั่งซื้อได้ที่ Shopee
ติดต่อโฆษณาได้ที่ อีเมล์ crackersbooks2023@gmail.com